United States v. Castillo-Lucio

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 2002
Docket01-40418
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Castillo-Lucio (United States v. Castillo-Lucio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Castillo-Lucio, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40418 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR CASTILLO-LUCIO, also known as Jose Lopez Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-488-1 -------------------- April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edgar Castillo-Lucio appeals the sentence imposed following

his conviction for illegally reentering the United States after

having been deported, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues

that the district court erred by concluding that his prior

conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle was an

aggravated felony. However, he did not raise his argument in the

district court. Castillo-Lucio acknowledges that this court has

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-40418 -2-

held that the offense is an aggravated felony, and avers that he

is raising the issue solely to preserve it for further review.

This court rejected the precise argument raised by Castillo-

Lucio in United States v. Galvan-Rodriguez, 169 F.3d 217 (5th

Cir. 1999). Galvan-Rodriguez is binding precedent; therefore,

absent a decision by the Supreme Court or en banc consideration

by this Court, it cannot be overturned by another panel of this

court. See United States v. Arce, 118 F.3d 335, 338-39 (5th Cir.

1997). AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Arce
118 F.3d 335 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Galvan-Rodriguez
169 F.3d 217 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Castillo-Lucio, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castillo-lucio-ca5-2002.