United States v. Carter

18 C.M.A. 566, 18 USCMA 566, 40 C.M.R. 278, 1969 CMA LEXIS 723, 1969 WL 6065
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedSeptember 12, 1969
DocketNo. 21,993
StatusPublished

This text of 18 C.M.A. 566 (United States v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carter, 18 C.M.A. 566, 18 USCMA 566, 40 C.M.R. 278, 1969 CMA LEXIS 723, 1969 WL 6065 (cma 1969).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

This case involves the adequacy of the preliminary inquiry made by the president of this special court-martial regarding the providence of Carter’s plea of guilty to absence without leave, a violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886.

The extent of the compliance necessary to satisfy this requirement is fully discussed and delineated in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. The procedure followed in this case would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in United States v Care, supra. Nonetheless, post-finding sworn testimony of the accused that he had gone absent without leave, and would go again, assures us that his plea of guilty was knowledgeable. For this reason, we affirm the decision of the board of review.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Care
18 C.M.A. 535 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 C.M.A. 566, 18 USCMA 566, 40 C.M.R. 278, 1969 CMA LEXIS 723, 1969 WL 6065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carter-cma-1969.