United States v. Carter

202 F. App'x 831
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 24, 2006
Docket06-50167
StatusUnpublished

This text of 202 F. App'x 831 (United States v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carter, 202 F. App'x 831 (5th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Sean Carter, federal prisoner # 68711-080, pleaded guilty in 1996 to possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Carter now appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion.

Carter’s contention that his sentence is subject to modification in light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), is without merit. Section 3582(c)(2) is inapplicable because Booker did not involve a retroactive amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Shaw, 30 F.3d 26, 28 (5th Cir.1994); § 3582(c)(2).

With respect to Carter’s assertion that he is entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 591 to the Guidelines, Carter did not raise this argument in the district court. Accordingly, we need not consider it. See United States v. Pardue, 36 F.3d 429, 431 (5th Cir.1994). Regardless, Carter’s argument is without merit. Amendment 591 is not relevant to either the determination of a specific offense level within the applicable guideline section or the consideration of relevant conduct. See U.S.S.G.App. C, Amendment 591 (Nov.2000). Therefore, the district court was not prohibited from considering additional amounts of drugs not included in the charged offense.

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Patricia Ann Shaw
30 F.3d 26 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Donald Pardue
36 F.3d 429 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 F. App'x 831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carter-ca5-2006.