United States v. Carroll

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carroll. Read the opinion of the Court — 470 F. App'x 192
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2009·No. 09-6418·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6418

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID CARROLL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:94-cr-00519-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David Carroll appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and his motion to

convene a three-judge district court. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Carroll's motion to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Carroll, No. 1:94-cr-

00519-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carroll, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Carroll (United States v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related