United States v. Carroll
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6418
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID CARROLL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:94-cr-00519-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: July 1, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Carroll, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Carroll appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and his motion to
convene a three-judge district court. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Carroll's motion to remand and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Carroll, No. 1:94-cr-
00519-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Carroll (United States v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.