United States v. Carranza-Rubio
Opinion
Case: 23-50547 Document: 48-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50547 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 5, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Jose Domingo Carranza-Rubio,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:21-CR-1423-1 ______________________________
Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Jose Domingo Carranza-Rubio appeals his conviction for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He asserts for the first time on appeal that the statutory sentencing enhancement in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional, although he concedes that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-50547 Document: 48-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/05/2024
No. 23-50547
United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). He thus moves for summary disposition of the appeal. Because Carranza-Rubio’s argument is foreclosed, see United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019), summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp. Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Carranza-Rubio (United States v. Carranza-Rubio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.