United States v. Carmichael

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carmichael. Read the opinion of the Court — 408 F. App'x 769
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2009·No. 09-6382·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6382

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRY CARMICHAEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:01-cr-00078-F-1)

Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terry Carmichael, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terry Carmichael appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Carmichael, No.

7:01-cr-00078-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carmichael, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Carmichael (United States v. Carmichael) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related