United States v. Carey

689 F. App'x 627
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJuly 7, 2017
Docket17-7006
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 689 F. App'x 627 (United States v. Carey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carey, 689 F. App'x 627 (10th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

*628 ORDER AND JUDGMENT **

Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge

Defendant-Appellant Jason Wayne Carey appeals from the sentence imposed after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession of explosives. 18 U.S.C. §§ 842(i)(l), 844(a)(1). Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a), and we remand to the district court to vacate the judgment and resentence.

Mr. Carey was sentenced to 60 months’ imprisonment and three years’ supervised release. 1 R. 42-44. The PSR recommended a guideline range of 37 to 46 months, based in part on Mr. Carey committing the offense “subsequent to sustaining one felony conviction of either a crime of violence or a controlled substance offense.” U.S.S.G. § 2K1.3(a)(2); see 3 R. 3-4. The prior violent felony was pointing a weapon at another person in violation of Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1289.16. See 3 R. 4. But in United States v. Titties, 852 F.3d 1257, 1275 (10th Cir. 2017), we held that a conviction under this statute does not qualify as a crime of violence under the Armed Career Criminal Act. This definition resembles that found in the sentencing guidelines. The government concedes that this intervening decision controls here. Aplee. Br. at 4. Accordingly, we REMAND to the district court to vacate its judgment and resentence.

**

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brown
974 F.3d 1137 (Tenth Circuit, 2020)
United States v. Carey
Tenth Circuit, 2018

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
689 F. App'x 627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carey-ca10-2017.