United States v. Cardoza-Sarabia
This text of 531 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Cardoza-Sarabia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY
Movant Roberto Cardoza-Sarabia seeks a certifícate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial by the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his sentence and conviction because of ineffective assistance of counsel with respect to his guilty plea. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring COA to appeal denial of § 2255 motion). The district court denied the motion because it was untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f).
The district court was clearly correct. The judgment was entered against Movant on December 17, 2009. He did not appeal. He filed his § 2255 motion on October 12, 2012. In district court he gave no reason to overcome the statutory bar, nor has he done so in this court. We DENY a COA and dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
531 F. App'x 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cardoza-sarabia-ca10-2013.