United States v. Cardoza-Sarabia

531 F. App'x 932
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 5, 2013
Docket13-8049
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 531 F. App'x 932 (United States v. Cardoza-Sarabia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cardoza-Sarabia, 531 F. App'x 932 (10th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Movant Roberto Cardoza-Sarabia seeks a certifícate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial by the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside his sentence and conviction because of ineffective assistance of counsel with respect to his guilty plea. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (requiring COA to appeal denial of § 2255 motion). The district court denied the motion because it was untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f).

The district court was clearly correct. The judgment was entered against Movant on December 17, 2009. He did not appeal. He filed his § 2255 motion on October 12, 2012. In district court he gave no reason to overcome the statutory bar, nor has he done so in this court. We DENY a COA and dismiss the appeal. Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardoza-Sarabia v. United States
134 S. Ct. 1041 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 F. App'x 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cardoza-sarabia-ca10-2013.