United States v. Capehart

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6399

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DANA AMILE CAPEHART,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1)

Submitted: August 16, 2010 Decided: September 10, 2010

Before NIEMEYER and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dana Amile Capehart, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dana Amile Capehart appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Capehart, No. 2:06-cr-00113-RAJ-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED