United States v. Cantrell

18 C.M.A. 572, 18 USCMA 572, 40 C.M.R. 284, 1969 CMA LEXIS 730, 1969 WL 6072
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided September 12, 1969·No. No. 22,152·Published

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

.Darden, Judge:

The inquiry into the appellant’s plea of guilty to a single specification of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. In this instance, however, Cantrell has given a statement in an attempt to secure mitigation, admitting the unauthorized absence, one hundred eighty-nine days in duration. Therefore, we find the plea provident.

Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cantrell, 18 C.M.A. 572, 18 USCMA 572, 40 C.M.R. 284, 1969 CMA LEXIS 730, 1969 WL 6072 (cma 1969).

18 C.M.A. 572 (United States v. Cantrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Care
18 C.M.A. 535 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1969)