United States v. Cantrell
This text of 18 C.M.A. 572 (United States v. Cantrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
The inquiry into the appellant’s plea of guilty to a single specification of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886, would not meet the standard that must apply to cases tried thirty days after the decision in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247. In this instance, however, Cantrell has given a statement in an attempt to secure mitigation, admitting the unauthorized absence, one hundred eighty-nine days in duration. Therefore, we find the plea provident.
Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 C.M.A. 572, 18 USCMA 572, 40 C.M.R. 284, 1969 CMA LEXIS 730, 1969 WL 6072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cantrell-cma-1969.