United States v. Candido-Gonzalez
This text of 146 F. App'x 134 (United States v. Candido-Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Martin Candido-Gonzalez appeals his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights in making an upward adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(B) for a prior drug-trafficking conviction. As Candido-Gonzalez acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed by this court’s case law. See United States v. Moreno-Hernandez, 419 F.3d 906, 914 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005) (amended opin[135]*135ion). In his opening brief, Candido-Gonzalez declined to exercise his right to request a remand for resentencing under United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1084-85 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 F. App'x 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-candido-gonzalez-ca9-2005.