United States v. Canady

641 F. App'x 276
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 21, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7412
StatusPublished

This text of 641 F. App'x 276 (United States v. Canady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Canady, 641 F. App'x 276 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles G. Canady appeals the district court’s denial of relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Canady, No. 7:02-cr-00127-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 3, 2015). We deny Canady’s motion to appoint counsel and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [277]*277materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 F. App'x 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-canady-ca4-2016.