United States v. Canady

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Canady

368 F. App'x 402

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 4, 2010·No. No. 09-7659·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Canady appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. The district court found that the drug offenses for which Canady was convicted involved more than 4500 grams of cocaine base, and thus a reduction was not warranted. Because our review of the record reveals no reversible error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Canady appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction in sentence. The district court found that the drug offenses for which Canady was convicted involved more than 4500 grams of cocaine base, and thus a reduction was not warranted. Because our review of the record reveals no reversible error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Canady, 368 F. App'x 402 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

368 F. App'x 402 (United States v. Canady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related