United States v. Campos

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Campos. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 F. App'x 557
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2007·No. 07-6209·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6209

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

IPOLITO CAMPOS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:03-cr-00032-HCM)

Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 3, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ipolito Campos, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ipolito Campos appeals the district court’s order denying

his self-styled motion to “Invok[e] the Inherent Equity

Jurisdiction of this Court as Recognized in the Savings Clause of

F.R.C.P. 60(b),” after Campos rejected the district court’s notice

and attempt to construe Campos’ motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Campos, No. 2:03-cr-00032-HCM (E.D. Va.

Dec. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campos, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Campos (United States v. Campos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related