United States v. Campos
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6209
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
IPOLITO CAMPOS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:03-cr-00032-HCM)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: May 3, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ipolito Campos, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ipolito Campos appeals the district court’s order denying
his self-styled motion to “Invok[e] the Inherent Equity
Jurisdiction of this Court as Recognized in the Savings Clause of
F.R.C.P. 60(b),” after Campos rejected the district court’s notice
and attempt to construe Campos’ motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Campos, No. 2:03-cr-00032-HCM (E.D. Va.
Dec. 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Campos (United States v. Campos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.