United States v. Campos

225 F. App'x 192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Campos. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 F. App'x 557
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 3, 2007·No. No. 07-6209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ipolito Campos appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled motion to “Invok[e] the Inherent Equity Jurisdiction of this Court as Recognized in the Savings Clause of F.R.C.P. 60(b),” after Campos rejected the district court’s notice and attempt to construe Campos’ motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United, States v. Campos, No. 2:03-cr-00032-HCM, 2006 WL 3760061 (E.D.Va. Dec. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campos, 225 F. App'x 192 (4th Cir. 2007).

225 F. App'x 192 (United States v. Campos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related