United States v. Campos-Alonzo

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2007·No. 06-7329·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7329

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NESTOR CAMPOS-ALONZO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:02-cr-00281-FWB; 1:06-cv-00122-FWB)

Submitted: August 23, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nestor Campos-Alonzo, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Nestor Campos-Alonzo appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Campos-Alonzo, Nos.

1:02-cr-00281-FWB; 1:06-cv-00122-FWB (M.D.N.C. filed June 30, 2006;

entered July 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campos-Alonzo, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Campos-Alonzo (United States v. Campos-Alonzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related