United States v. Caldwell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6319
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DARRIN W. CALDWELL, a/k/a Darren, a/k/a Officer Darrell,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:00-cr-00009-LHT-3)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrin W. Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Darrin W. Caldwell appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion to reduce his sentence filed pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United
States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S.
Ct. 2401 (2009). We deny the Government’s motion to dismiss the
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Caldwell (United States v. Caldwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.