United States v. Calderon

178 F. App'x 385
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Calderon. Read the opinion of the Court — 209 F. App'x 418
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 2, 2006·No. 05-10911·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Martin A. Calderon (Calderon) on appeal, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Calderon, who was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to commit kidnaping and kidnaping and aiding and abetting, received a copy of counsel’s motion and has filed a response. Calderon has also filed a motion for leave to amend his response and has requested that the court appoint new counsel.

Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Calderon’s response, and the record discloses no issue of arguable merit for appeal. Accordingly, Calderon’s motion for leave to amend his response to counsel’s Anders’ brief is GRANTED; Calderon’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Calderon, 178 F. App'x 385 (5th Cir. 2006).

178 F. App'x 385 (United States v. Calderon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)