United States v. Calderon

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2004
Docket95-11064
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Calderon (United States v. Calderon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Calderon, (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11064 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON CALDERON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CR-097 - - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY AND HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nelson Calderon appeals his convictions of conspiring to

possess with intent to distribute in excess of 100 grams of

methamphetamine and to possess with intent to distribute in

excess of 500 grams of cocaine; using a telephone to facilitate

the possession with intent to distribute cocaine and possession

with intent to distribute methamphetamine; possession with intent

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-11064 - 2 -

to distribute methamphetamine in excess of 100 grams; possession

with intent to distribute in excess of 500 grams of cocaine; and

using a person under 18 years of age to possess with intent to

distribute methamphetamine and cocaine. He argues that the

district court abused its discretion when it admitted Government

Exhibit 28 into evidence. We have reviewed the record and briefs

of the parties and hold that the admission of the document, even

if it was inadmissible, was harmless error because it was

cumulative of other testimony. See United States v. Allie, 978

F.2d 1401, 1408-09 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1662

(1993).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Stephen Ross Allie
978 F.2d 1401 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Calderon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-calderon-ca5-2004.