United States v. Caiati-Medici
This text of 50 F. App'x 363 (United States v. Caiati-Medici) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant Damian Caiati-Medici expressly waived his appellate rights. Although Appellant argues that he does not understand English, an interpreter was supplied throughout the plea proceedings and, in addition, Appellant (a naturalized citizen with more than a decade of residency) spoke to the court in English. Because the waiver was knowing and voluntary, we dismiss this appeal. United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (explaining that a waiver of the right to an appeal is enforced if the waiver was made knowingly and voluntarily).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 F. App'x 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-caiati-medici-ca9-2002.