United States v. Cabiness

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7546

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KIRKWOOD DONNELL CABINESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (4:02-cr-70031-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kirkwood Donnell Cabiness appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Cabiness, No. 4:02-cr-70031-1 (W.D. Va. July 28, 2008; Aug. 8,

2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED