United States v. Butler
Opinion
Case: 23-10162 Document: 00516927552 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/11/2023
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-10162 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ October 11, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce United States of America, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Dashawn Burak Butler,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-121-1 ______________________________
Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Dashawn Burak Butler has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Butler has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Butler’s claims of
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 23-10162 Document: 00516927552 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/11/2023
No. 23-10162
ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Butler’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Butler (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.