United States v. Butler

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 F.4th 584
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 21, 2023·No. 22-30580·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-30580 Document: 00516721767 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED April 21, 2023 No. 22-30580 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Irvin J. Butler,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:20-CR-157-1 ______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant Irvin J. Butler has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Butler has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-30580 Document: 00516721767 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2023

No. 22-30580

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Butler, (5th Cir. 2023).

United States v. Butler (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)