United States v. Bush

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bush. Read the opinion of the Court — 585 F.3d 806
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 16, 2009·No. 09-7028·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7028

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TROY DEAN BUSH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00037-RLV-14)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Dean Bush, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C.F. Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Troy Dean Bush appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence

reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Bush, No. 5:03-cr-00037-RLV-14

(W.D.N.C. June 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bush, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Bush (United States v. Bush) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related