United States v. Burvon King

521 F. App'x 350
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 2013
Docket12-11178
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 521 F. App'x 350 (United States v. Burvon King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burvon King, 521 F. App'x 350 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Burvon King, federal prisoner # 21029-077, appeals the district court’s denying *351 his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. (He has filed several such motions previously.) King’s brief is virtually identical to the motion filed in district court. The brief fails to identify any error in the denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion. Although a pro se brief is afforded liberal construction, e.g., Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.1993), when appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it is the same as if appellant has not appealed that issue, Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.1987). King has abandoned the only issue on appeal by failing to brief it adequately. E.g., Yohey, 985 F.2d at 224-25.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *351 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodney Mayes v. Michael Kollman
560 F. App'x 389 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 F. App'x 350, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burvon-king-ca5-2013.