United States v. Burton

484 F. App'x 852
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 23, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6031
StatusPublished

This text of 484 F. App'x 852 (United States v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burton, 484 F. App'x 852 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lashun D. Burton filed a “Motion to be appointed counsel,” seeking an attorney to assist him with filing a 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of sentence based upon Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. The district court construed the motion as a § 3582 motion and granted it, reducing Burton’s sentence from 241 months to 212 months in prison. On appeal, Burton claims that the court erred in construing his filing as a § 3582 motion. Because Burton failed to raise this claim in district court and because he fails to show any prejudice from the district court’s ruling, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 F. App'x 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burton-ca4-2012.