United States v. Burney

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Burney

415 F. App'x 449

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 7, 2011·No. No. 10-6709·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Saydon Kurtis Burney appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burney, No. 3:05-cr-00402-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[450]*450terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Saydon Kurtis Burney appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burney, No. 3:05-cr-00402-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[450]*450terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Burney, 415 F. App'x 449 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

415 F. App'x 449 (United States v. Burney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related