United States v. Burney

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 7, 2011
• Docket: 10-6709
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6709

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAYDON KURTIS BURNEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00402-REP-1)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 7, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Saydon Kurtis Burney, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Saydon Kurtis Burney appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Burney, No. 3:05-cr-

00402-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Apr. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED