United States v. Burnett
This text of United States v. Burnett (United States v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
CASEY SEON BURNETT,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:99-cr-00006-CMC-5)
Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Casey Seon Burnett, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Casey Seon Burnett appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for
reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Burnett, No.
4:99-cr-00006-CMC-5 (D.S.C. June 12, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Burnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burnett-ca4-2009.