United States v. Burnett

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2009
Docket08-7051
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Burnett (United States v. Burnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burnett, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7051

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CASEY SEON BURNETT,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:99-cr-00006-CMC-5)

Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Casey Seon Burnett, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Casey Seon Burnett appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for

reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Burnett, No.

4:99-cr-00006-CMC-5 (D.S.C. June 12, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Burnett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burnett-ca4-2009.