United States v. Burgess

546 F. App'x 197
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 12, 2013·No. No. 13-7046·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Frisalyn Burgess appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 4:07-cr-00481-TLW-8 (D.S.C. June 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Burgess, 546 F. App'x 197 (4th Cir. 2013).

546 F. App'x 197 (United States v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SMITH v. VOORHEES TOWNSHIP
D. New Jersey, 2019
Hensley Ex Rel. North Carolina v. Price
876 F.3d 573 (Fourth Circuit, 2017)
Maney v. Fealy
69 F. Supp. 3d 553 (M.D. North Carolina, 2014)