United States v. Bukumirovic

624 F. App'x 96
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 7, 2015
DocketNo. 15-7027
StatusPublished

This text of 624 F. App'x 96 (United States v. Bukumirovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bukumirovic, 624 F. App'x 96 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marko Bukumirovic appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 782. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Bukumirovic, No. 1:13-cr-00291-LMB-1 (E.D.Va. June 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 F. App'x 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bukumirovic-ca4-2015.