United States v. Buchanan

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Buchanan. Read the opinion of the Court — 638 F.3d 448
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2009·No. 09-7584·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7584

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMIE LAMONT BUCHANAN, a/k/a JB,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:93-cr-00039-GCM-3)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 21, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamie Lamont Buchanan, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamie Lamont Buchanan appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Buchanan, No. 3:93-cr-00039-GCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 12, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Buchanan, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Buchanan (United States v. Buchanan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related