United States v. Bryant
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6340
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VERNON BRYANT, a/k/a Raymond Jackson, a/k/a Cully, a/k/a Samual Barry,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:97-cr-00352-REP-1)
Submitted: April 20, 2009 Decided: May 11, 2009
Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Vernon Bryant appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant, No.
3:97-cr-00352-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bryant (United States v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.