United States v. Bryant

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bryant. Read the opinion of the Court — 417 F. App'x 220
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 11, 2009·No. 09-6340·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6340

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VERNON BRYANT, a/k/a Raymond Jackson, a/k/a Cully, a/k/a Samual Barry,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:97-cr-00352-REP-1)

Submitted: April 20, 2009 Decided: May 11, 2009

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Vernon Bryant appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant, No.

3:97-cr-00352-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bryant, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Bryant (United States v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related