United States v. Brumaire
This text of United States v. Brumaire (United States v. Brumaire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7281
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LIVINSON BRUMAIRE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00474-CWH-8)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Livinson Brumaire, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Livinson Brumaire appeals a district court order
denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). The district court found Brumaire was not
eligible for a reduction because he was responsible for more
than 4.5 kilograms of crack cocaine. We affirm.
We find the district did not abuse its discretion
denying Brumaire’s motion for a sentence reduction. United
States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Brumaire, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brumaire-ca4-2009.