United States v. Brown

429 F.2d 983
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 434 F.2d 1042
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 9, 1970·No. Nos. 25618, 25643·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

We find no illegally “seized” evidence as a matter of law, no illegal search under the circumstances, and find adequate evidence to support the verdict.

On the first contention the court accepts United States v. Polansky, 418 F.2d 444 (2d Cir., 1969); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir., 1969); Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir., 1968); and Dryden v. United States, 391 F.2d 214 (5th Cir., 1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, 429 F.2d 983 (9th Cir. 1970).

429 F.2d 983 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William Fred Dryden v. United States
391 F.2d 214 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Moses Polansky
418 F.2d 444 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Doty v. United States
416 F.2d 887 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)