United States v. Brown

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Brown

429 F.2d 983

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 1970

DocketNos. 25618, 25643

StatusPublished

This text of 429 F.2d 983 (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Brown, 429 F.2d 983 (9th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

We find no illegally “seized” evidence as a matter of law, no illegal search under the circumstances, and find adequate evidence to support the verdict.

On the first contention the court accepts United States v. Polansky, 418 F.2d 444 (2d Cir., 1969); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir., 1969); Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir., 1968); and Dryden v. United States, 391 F.2d 214 (5th Cir., 1968).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

We find no illegally “seized” evidence as a matter of law, no illegal search under the circumstances, and find adequate evidence to support the verdict.

On the first contention the court accepts United States v. Polansky, 418 F.2d 444 (2d Cir., 1969); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir., 1969); Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir., 1968); and Dryden v. United States, 391 F.2d 214 (5th Cir., 1968).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 F.2d 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-ca9-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack