United States v. Brown

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 2022
Docket20-60958
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Brown (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brown, (5th Cir. 2022).

Opinion

Case: 20-60958 Document: 00516167923 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/14/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 20-60958 January 14, 2022 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Earnest Lee Brown,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:13-CR-15-1

Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Earnest Lee Brown, federal prisoner # 15103-042, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release under the First Step Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). He argues that he has shown extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting compassionate release in

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-60958 Document: 00516167923 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/14/2022

No. 20-60958

light of the COVID-19 pandemic, asserting, inter alia, that he is at higher risk of illness from COVID-19 based on his medical conditions, namely hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and that other factors, such as the non- violent nature of his offense, the percentage of his sentence he has already served, and his post-sentencing conduct, weigh in favor of relief. He also argues, in reply to the Government’s brief, that the district court failed to consider the sentencing factors of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The district court denied Brown’s motion without the benefit of intervening Fifth Circuit authority. We therefore VACATE the district court’s order and REMAND for further consideration in light of United States v. Shkambi, 993 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2021). Insofar as Brown moves this court to reduce his sentence to time served, the motion is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Shkambi
993 F.3d 388 (Fifth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-ca5-2022.