United States v. Brown

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brown. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 F.3d 661
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2002·No. 01-10710·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10710 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

TRACY L BROWN

Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:92-CR-7-1-R -------------------- May 28, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Tracy L. Brown has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has received a copy of

counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se brief

of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-30485 -2-

from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Brown (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)