United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 20, 1999·No. 99-20190·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20190 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL D. BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-92-CR-ALL --------------------

December 16, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Assistant Federal Public Defenders appointed to

represent Michael Dejean Brown have filed a motion to withdraw

from representation of Brown and a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has responded to

counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief, the

record, and Brown’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, Brown’s court-appointed attorneys’ motion to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-20190 -2-

withdraw is GRANTED; the attorneys are excused from further

responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Brown (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)