United States v. Brown

466 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 21, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7188
StatusPublished

This text of 466 F. App'x 188 (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brown, 466 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. In his motion, Brown sought the benefit of Amendments 591 and 599 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Amendments 591 and 599 became effective on November 1, 2000, and were incorporated into the 2000 version of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual, pursuant to which Brown’s Guidelines range was calculated. As such, he received the benefit of Amendments [189]*189591 and 599 at the time of sentencing in August 2001, and his § 3582(c)(2) motion was properly denied. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-ca4-2012.