United States v. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 30, 1997·No. 97-6980·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6980

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PHILIP G. BROWN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-94-8)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Philip G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a)(1)(1994), to abolish the

supervised release portion of his sentence. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-94-8 (N.D.W. Va. July 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brown, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Brown (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Review of a sentence
18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1)