United States v. Brown

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,

versus

JOSEPH NATHANIEL BROWN, JR., a/k/a Joe Jr., Defendant - Appellant,

versus

CHARLES DAVID WHALEY, Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-93-151)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Nathaniel Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charles David Whaley, MORCHOWER, LUXTON & WHALEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his request for monetary sanctions from his attorney if his attorney failed to comply with a court order by a certain date. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-93-151 (E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED