United States v. Brown

Second Circuit

United States v. Brown

55 F.2d 72, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3698

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 18, 1932

DocketNo. 216

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 55 F.2d 72 (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Brown, 55 F.2d 72, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3698 (2d Cir. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There was sufficient evidence to support the finding that Brown and Lieberman were the owner's of the business; that a common nuisance was permitted by the owners to exist at the premises in violation of the Prohibition Act (27 USCA); but not enough was done under the special appearance for Lieberman to amount to submission to the jurisdiction. United States v. Collins and Lawlor (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 70.

Decree modified to vacate the personal injunction against Lieberman and in all other respects affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There was sufficient evidence to support the finding that Brown and Lieberman were the owner's of the business; that a common nuisance was permitted by the owners to exist at the premises in violation of the Prohibition Act (27 USCA); but not enough was done under the special appearance for Lieberman to amount to submission to the jurisdiction. United States v. Collins and Lawlor (C. C. A.) 55 F.(2d) 70.

Decree modified to vacate the personal injunction against Lieberman and in all other respects affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 F.2d 72, 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-ca2-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack