United States v. Brown

312 F. App'x 201
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 4, 2009
DocketNo. 08-12909
StatusPublished

This text of 312 F. App'x 201 (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Brown, 312 F. App'x 201 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Brown, a federal prisoner convicted of a crack cocaine offense, pro se appeals the district court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction based on an amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines that lowered the base offense levels applicable to crack cocaine. The district court denied Brown’s § 3582(c)(2) motion because the sentencing court based Brown’s sentence on a statutory mandatory term of life imprisonment and not according to the base level in § 2D 1.1. Therefore, Brown was not entitled to a sentence reduction under the crack cocaine amendments. United States v. Williams, 549 F.3d 1337 (11th Cir.2008).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Williams
549 F.3d 1337 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
312 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-ca11-2009.