United States v. Begay

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Begay

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 4, 2010

Docket07-10487

StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Begay (United States v. Begay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Begay, (9th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-10487 v.  D.C. No. CR-06-00626-DGC KENDERICK BEGAY, a.k.a. Kendrick Begay, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.  Filed January 4, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-10487 v.  D.C. No. CR-06-00626-DGC KENDERICK BEGAY, a.k.a. Kendrick Begay, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.  Filed January 4, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

United States v. Begay, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-begay-ca9-2010.