United States v. Brow
This text of United States v. Brow (United States v. Brow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8128
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KIMPEST GERARD BROWN, a/k/a Akeem Brown, a/k/a Sam Green, a/k/a Kevin Brown,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:01-cr-00169-LMB-1)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 23, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kimpest Gerard Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Riley Pedersen, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kimpest Gerard Brown appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for
appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 1:01-cr-
00169-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Brow, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brow-ca4-2010.