United States v. Broadway

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 30, 2009
Docket09-7033
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Broadway (United States v. Broadway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Broadway, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

OLANDUS BROADWAY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00010-MR-2)

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 30, 2009

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Olandus Broadway, Appellant Pro Se. C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Olandus Broadway appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Broadway, No. 3:08-cr-00010-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Broadway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-broadway-ca4-2009.