United States v. Broadway

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Broadway

329 F. App'x 476

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2009·No. No. 09-7033·Published

Opinion

[477] Affirmed by unpublished PER CTJRIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Olandus Broadway appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Broadway, No. 3:08-er-00010-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[477] Affirmed by unpublished PER CTJRIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Olandus Broadway appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Broadway, No. 3:08-er-00010-MR-2 (W.D.N.C. May 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Broadway, 329 F. App'x 476 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

329 F. App'x 476 (United States v. Broadway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related