United States v. Briscoe

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7652

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

RICHARD DONNELL BRISCOE, a/k/a PR, a/k/a Bones, a/k/a P,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:04-cr-00559-AW-1)

Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Donnell Briscoe, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard Donnell Briscoe appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Briscoe, No. 8:04-cr-

00559-AW-1 (D. Md. Nov. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED