United States v. Brim

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6281

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY WENDELL BRIM,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00009-jlk-4)

Submitted: April 20, 2011 Decided: May 5, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Wendell Brim, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Wendell Brim appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Brim, No. 4:06-cr-00009-jlk-4

(W.D. Va. Feb. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED