United States v. Briggs

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Briggs. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 F. App'x 403
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 19, 2003·No. 02-51248·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51248 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WINDELL JOE BRIGGS,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CR-106-ALL --------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Windell Joe Briggs on

appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as

required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Briggs

has received a copy of counsel’s motion and has filed a response.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-51248 -2-

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Briggs, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Briggs (United States v. Briggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)