United States v. Briggs
This text of United States v. Briggs (United States v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-51248 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WINDELL JOE BRIGGS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-02-CR-106-ALL --------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Windell Joe Briggs on
appeal has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as
required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Briggs
has received a copy of counsel’s motion and has filed a response.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is granted, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities, and the appeal is dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-51248 -2-
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Briggs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-briggs-ca5-2003.